Thursday, March 31, 2011

IMF Draft Rules Endorse Capital Controls as Last Resort


For now, capital controls are being contemplated by those countries with strong currencies and large capital inflows to keep money from flowing into these countries/currencies (Brazil, etc...).
Should the U.S. fiscal position not be dealt with, when will capital controls be considered for the U.S., KEEP MONEY FROM LEAVING?
Watch this closely, this is not a positive development at all.
From Bloomberg News:
Nations should be able to use capital controls as a last resort to manage inflows of money that threaten their financial stability, according to draft guidelines discussed last week by the board of the International Monetary Fund.
Such controls should be applied only after countries strengthen their banking systems and adopt economic measures such as building up reserves, tightening fiscal policies and lowering central bank interest rates, according to the draft guidelines, obtained by Bloomberg News.
“In the past, capital controls were not in our toolkit,” IMF Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn said separately in a statement posted on the fund’s website. “Today, we see them more as part of the toolkit, although only in specific circumstances and not, of course, as a substitute for good macroeconomic policies.”
More here...  

Monday, March 28, 2011

Berkshire Wrote Down U.S. Bancorp, Swiss Re After SEC Query

I am still not sure how Berkshire can only partially mark its equity portfolio to market....


While it is certainly encouraging that they are marking some positions to market, it seems that they are resisting markdowns on Wells Fargo and Kraft (surprising that they would not mark down Kraft in particular because high food prices will ultimately reduce margins or lead to increased product prices and resultant switching away from their name brands....as for Wells Fargo, if anyone can really analyze any of the major banks, please let me know!)


From the Bloomberg article:   “As a result of our discussions, we recognize that the staff” of the SEC believes that impairments on the investments may be required according to generally accepted accounting principles, Berkshire Chief Financial Officer Marc Hamburg wrote. 

Not a particularly strong endorsement of the GAAP which companies other than Berkshire are required to follow....


From Bloomberg news...
Berkshire Wrote Down U.S. Bankcorp, Swiss Re After SEC Query


    (Updates with Berkshire refusing to write down Wells Fargo, Kraft in the fourth paragraph.)

By Andrew Frye
    March 28 (Bloomberg) -- Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. wrote down the value of holdings in U.S.  ancorp, Sanofi- Aventis SA and Swiss Reinsurance Co. after a query from the Securities and Exchange Commission over valuations.
    The adjustments to the equity stakes were made to Berkshire’s fourth-quarter results in its annual Form 10-K
report, according to a Feb. 4 letter from Omaha, Nebraska-based Berkshire to the regulator. The letter was filed today on the SEC’s website.
    “As a result of our discussions, we recognize that the staff” of the SEC believes that impairments on the investments may be required according to generally accepted accounting principles, Berkshire Chief Financial Officer Marc Hamburg wrote.
    Berkshire, which held $61.5 billion of equities as of Dec. 31, was asked by the SEC in January for more information about stockholdings that traded below the prices paid by the company. The firm recorded equity impairments of $938 million in the fourth quarter. Berkshire told the SEC that it wasn’t writing down its holdings of Kraft Foods Inc. and Wells Fargo & Co. because it expects the stocks recover.


continued here...
Berkshire Wrote Down U.S. Bankcorp, Swiss Re After SEC Query

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

The SPX and the SPX vs Gold

The SPX vs USD does not look like it has had a bad run, particularly over the past year....in fact, it may perhaps have a bounce (though I believe that it will retest 1265 at some point this year).



However, when you look at the SPX vs Gold, a very different picture, and far less bullish picture, emerges....will SPX vs Gold push above the 200 day moving average?

I am much less sure of this but also would expect some pullback in gold as well this year, particularly if the Fed were to indicate any normalization of interest rates, making gold, at least at the margin, a little bit more expensive to hold...however, as long as real rates are less than zero I would not bet on a large pullback, just enough to squeeze out some who have been late to the party...

Some confirmation of what you may be hearing on the elevator or train...

Every so often you hear something strange on the elevator or train which, although completely anecdotal, may subtly or not so subtly influence your investment decisions, at least until you can gather facts and examine the situation somewhat objectively....


Examples for me have included:


1. The 'Pets.com' sock puppet coming back years later as the mascot for the '1-800-bar-none' sub-prime lender.
(this may have been a once in a lifetime event - recall that Pets.com paid millions for a superbowl add with this mascot and then went bust; only to have the same mascot resurrected years later for a sub-prime lender at the top of the subprime wave}


2. Very large multi-strategy hedge fund controller prior to 2008 bragging to a friend about how all their fund had to do is stay in business several years and they would all be rich....


3. Recently, a junior employee of an investment firm's long-only high yield bond investment team, speaking with a more seasoned manager at a different firm:  "nothing is cheap anymore, covenants are light, but we don't care because we are supposed to buy and we will continue to buy because interest rates are zero, investors are begging for yield and if we don't buy these things, somebody else will."


From the article below, at least somebody at the Fed seems to agree, which is a good thing.  To the extent that the monetary spigots are turned down a bit, however, it would seem that investors in monetary assets will have to deal with whatever hangover as this latest binge of credit easing is pulled back....


Is it time to take a vacation and simply allocate to short term instruments in various currencies until the latest binge is over?



From Bloomberg news...
Fed's Fisher Sees 'Extraordinary Speculative Activity' in U.S.l
By Caroline Salas and Rainer Buergin
 Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas President Richard W. Fisher said he sees “extraordinary speculative activity” in the U.S. after the central bank pumped record amounts of stimulus into the economy.
“There is an enormous amount of liquidity sloshing around,” the regional bank chief, who votes on monetary policy this year, said in a speech today in Berlin. “There is abundant liquidity in the machine we know as the United States economy.”
The Fed will likely complete its planned $600 billion of Treasury purchases in June, Fisher said, reiterating his view that no further monetary stimulus will be needed after that. The 62-year-old bank president has criticized the plan, which policy makers voted to keep in place after their March 15 meeting in Washington.
“The word that we gave was that the program would end in June,” Fisher said in a Bloomberg Television interview. “That’s what I expect to happen. And the markets have in my opinion adequately discounted that.”
Fisher repeated remarks he made yesterday in Frankfurt that he’s seeing signs of excess evidenced in the surge of so-called covenant-lite loans and the return of payouts by private equity firms.
“We have done our job,” Fisher said at a forum hosted by the American Academy in Berlin. “We are certainly at risk of doing too much now.”

‘Self-Sustaining’

The U.S. economic recovery is “self-sustaining” and will withstand turmoil overseas, Fisher said in the Bloomberg Television interview. The earthquake in Japan may impact the U.S. economythrough some “price and supply chain effects short term,” and the “wars in North Africa” won’t have a “long- term impact on the nature of monetary policy,” Fisher said.
“These can of course pinch a nerve or they can give you a bit of a shiver,” Fisher said. “I don’t think they’re going to derail what’s happening in terms of the economic growth occurring in the U.S. or here in Europe.”

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

"Breaking up is hard to do Commentary: Fed’s love affair with easy money must end"

Another argument against QE2....





By Irwin Kellner, MarketWatch
PORT WASHINGTON, N.Y. (MarketWatch) — The Federal Reserve’s love affair with easy money must end — the sooner the better.
In the face of overwhelming evidence that inflation has become a clear and present danger, the central bank continues to insist that easy money and low interest rates are de rigueur for today’s economy.
Its rationale is simple: The economy is still struggling, unemployment remains high, and the markets are reeling from a series of global shocks — the latest being Japan’s earthquake, tsunami and nuclear crisis.
If prices were stable, there would be no question that the Fed is on the right course. But prices are not stable: From basic commodities to wholesale right up to retail, prices are jumping.
As a former governor of New York used to say, let’s look at the record.
The Economist magazine’s weekly tabulation shows raw-materials prices are 35% higher than last year at this time, with non-food agricultural products soaring a whopping 76%.
Wholesale prices have risen at a 13% annual rate since November alone. Not surprisingly, the Institute for Supply Management’s measure of prices that companies pay for goods used in the manufacturing process stood at 82 last month — a sign that price pressures are common and severe.
At the retail level, consumer prices have jumped at a 5-1/4% clip over the past three months, after inching up at a more moderate 2% pace in the previous three. This has led many people to conclude that higher inflation is here to stay. Consumers polled by the University of Michigan expect prices to rise 4.6% over the next year.
The markets sniff inflation. The Treasury-TIPS spread is at a multi-year high. ( See last week’s column.) The yield curve is steep, gold is close to a record high, while the dollar has fallen in world financial markets.
Besides today’s inflation numbers, the markets are also looking at the effects of monetary ease.
The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis reports that the central bank’s monetary base has soared by a 54% annual rate since early November, an 83% clip since mid-December — and a thumping 152% pace over the last two months!
Adjusted reserves have climbed at an astounding 342% annual rate since mid-January, while both the money supply M2, and the St. Louis Fed’s measure of liquid money, MZM, are both up by a rate of more than 5% over the past 10 months.
Yet the Fed’s mantra seems to be “don’t worry, be happy.” Said Fed chief Ben Bernanke recently, “the most likely outcome is that the recent rise in commodity prices will lead to, at most, a temporary and relatively modest increase in U.S. consumer price inflation.”
But any increase in prices is bad news for those whose incomes are not rising commensurately — meaning most of us. Once they are up, prices rarely come down. As I pointed out in my column of Jan. 18, during the past decade the dollar has lost 20% of its buying power; since 1990 the overall loss is nearly 30%!
Central bankers would be aware of this if they shopped regularly like the rest of us, instead of sitting in their ivory towers looking at their iPads.

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Confusion Reigns

Confusion Reigns.....

With everything going on in Japan, Libya has been pushed off the headlines.  Benghazi looks like it will fall, as long as Gadaffi has enough fuel for his troops to drive there....France has recognized the rebels (one wonders what role Total had in this or if it was a move to outflank LePen supporters), but Italy is silent and the U.S. would be put in an awkward position should Gadaffi reestablish control and then have his revenge...

The Gulf nations have intervened in Bahrain and Iran is protesting, as expected.  In this unstable environment, and with Japan most likely moving to import more non-nuclear fuels, it would seem reasonable to expect oil to be higher rather than lower.....

However - confusion reigns at least for now as the margin clerks go to work...

Today's rather modest positioning....

Longs:
CHF
Oil
Cheap Telecom, Tech stock

Shorts:
GBP
EUR
Expensive Cloud stock

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

There's Only One Sure Thing in This Life and That's Doubt, I think. (Mulvaney, Goodbye Pork Pie)

Recent events in North Africa led me to think about a quote from a movie called "Goodbye Pork Pie", New Zealand's version of Easy Rider with a yellow mini instead of a motorcycle...(if you ever find yourself on an 18 hour flight, it helps kill the time).

"There's only one sure thing in this life and that's doubt, I think."


That sums up quite a bit.  Now is the time for caution - and for some selective buying.  

Will U.S. equity markets test interim lows?  Will U.S. bond rates come in with some safe haven buying?  Will U.S. high yield rates back up to more reasonable levels? Will QE3 be just over the horizon or will QE2 be left to pass?

I would add the following corollaries:

1. It is impossible to predict virtually anything with any sort of precision.
(Five year forecasts?  How are they possible?)

2. Be very wary of anyone who is 100% sure of anything.
(Most high profile example: The Bernank.  First thing you learn on Wall St. is to never guarantee anything, but then again The Bernank is an "academic".)

3. Revolutions do not end in days or weeks.
(It is clear that nobody remembers the Spanish Civil War, WWII.  It takes time to move people and materials around the world, you cannot move ships, people and material via email, yet.  The revolutions may end well but we will not know for quite a while)

4. Recent past experience guides most people's thoughts and opinions.
(Market up, sentiment up, high yield rates down, covenants being loosened again)

5. Just because a problem persists for some time, or longer than expected, does not mean that it is not a problem and does not mean that the problem will mushroom into a crisis.
(U.S. looming debt crisis)

Yes, there is quite a bit of negativity out there.  On the plus side, the economy is improving, real interest rates are negative, and the prevailing trend for equity prices is usually up so it is better not to be completely neutral or bearish unless the world is falling apart.....

(It is a product of its time, the late 1970s; not appropriate for children)